Prince Emmanuel Kanu, the brother of Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), has asserted that the separatist’s residence is surrounded by a large number of security personnel.
Ahead of the eagerly anticipated verdict on Kanu’s terrorism-related cases, Kanu sounded the alarm in a post posted on his Facebook page on Thursday morning.
“Breaking news!” he wrote. Many security guards are currently stationed around Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s family home. We are warning everyone on the planet.
According to reports, Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja is scheduled to render a decision today about a number of applications that the Federal Government has filed against Kanu.
Omotosho has instructed security personnel to remove Kanu from his courtroom in the interim.
According to reports, the judge issued the directive after the IPOB commander became unruly and began to raise his voice.
According to Justice Omotosho, Kanu had brought up the majority of the concerns brought up by the IPOB leader on multiple occasions in this court. “The court is bound by that order,” he said.
On the other hand, he stated that it would not be considered in relation to the court of appeals and the stay of proceedings. According Judge Omotosho, there are two different kinds of bail, and the matter at hand does not qualify for either. He said that the case’s hearing was over and that he would render a decision.
Kanu disagreed, arguing that he should submit his final written address, but the judge instructed him to behave himself.
Kanu, however, requested that the court show him the location of his final written address so that it may be waived.
Nnamdi Kanu addressed the court, “You don’t know the law. Show me where it says you can waive the right to a final address. Omotosho show me the law.”
As directed by the judge, Kanu refused to give the microphone to the DSS.
The judge ordered security personnel to remove Nnamdi Kanu from the courtroom after he persisted.
The judge declared that a defendant’s right to attend his trial is guaranteed by the constitution. The judge stated, “We have seen instances where the defendant beats his clients, shutting them up,” acknowledging that Kanu’s disruptive behavior is not new.
Additionally, the judge noted that despite his repeated appeals to Kanu, “in his usual manner, he refused to comport himself.”
The judge then mandated that the IPOB leader not be present throughout the case.
